All posts

In Austria right wing extremism is having a ball

ScreenHunter_01 Oct. 10 19.11It is a sad fact that each year right-wing student fraternities, the Burschenschaften, are allowed to hold a ball in Hofburg, which has grown into a major event on the yearly calendar of the Austrian and the wider European nationalist right. For all those not familiar with all of Austrian or German history, these student fraternities need a bit of an explanation.

What are Burschenschaften?

The student fraternities formed in the beginning of 19th century in university cities throughout what later became the German Reich. From the beginning their ideology was a nationalistic and völkisch (roughly translated: racial, but the basis is not an entire “race” but a people bound by blood and fate. This belief became the very core of Nazi ideology a century later.). The goal of the fraternities was the unification of all the lands they deemed “German” and the enemies that stood in their way soon became clear: the ideas of 1789 and the French per se as well as the Jews. So right at the beginning of the formation of the right-wing student fraternities, anti-Semitism played a decisive role. The second cornerstone of the Burschenshaften is their self-conception as “Männerbund”. ‘Mannerbund’ means that only men are allowed to take part in the fraternities and the ideological-theoretical justification for this exclusion lies in their misogynist belief that women are not ‘pure’ enough to be a part of these groups. This idea was theorized by the interwar nationalist ideologue Hans Blüher  and become propagated through not only the Burschenshaften but also the German ‘Jugendbewegung’ (youth movement) of the interwar period.

While a very weak “liberal” wing of the fraternity movement also emerged at the beginning of the 19th century, it became irrelevant as early as 1817. At the Wartburgfest in the same year the Burschenschaften gathered to burn books from French, Jewish, and progressive authors they deemed anti-German.

Austrian Burschenschaften (who thought of themselves as German and still do) formed as late as the 1860s. They never even had a liberal wing, but were among the most ruthless and völkisch. They were the first to adopt the Arierparagraph—a prerequisite (still implicitly applied in some fraternities) that only male students deemed Aryan are allowed to join—as early as in the 1890s.

Although these Austrian Burschenschaften see themselves as victims of the Third Reich, the opposite is true. They were not banned, as they claim, but willingly disbanded and  regrouped into the Nationalsozialistische Studentenbund, the student organisation of the NSDAP, which sought a monopoly on student representation. Many high-ranked Nazis were fraternity members in Austria and Germany, such as Adolf Eichmann or Irmfried Eberl, camp commander of the extermination camp Treblinka. In the post-war period Burschenschaften became a decisive player within organised right-wing extremism in Austria and Germany.

Right-wing extremist ball in the Hofburg

Long story short: These fraternities are allowed to hold a ball every year in the Viennese Hofburg Palace. The Hofburg and the area in front of the Heldenplatz, are one of the most important places in the history of Austria. It is the location where Hitler pronounced the so-called Anschluss, when Austria became part of the Third Reich. The ball functions as a networking event for the elite of right-wing extremism in Europe. The likes of Marine le Pen (Front National), Philip Dewinter (Vlaams Belang), Alexander Dugin (leader of Russian Eurasianism) and Patrik Brinkman (the well-known Swedish right-winger) have attended this ball in the past. Yet it is not simply a ball like any other, as the Freedom Party (FPÖ) always claims. After the Hofburg declared two years ago that it would ban the ball from this location, FPÖ offered to host the event, thereby allowing it to go ahead at the Hofburg. This shows how closely the FPÖ and the Burschenschaften are linked to each other. Before that the Burschenschaften themselves hosted the ball through its umbrella organisation Wiener Korporationsring (WKR), giving the ball its original name – WKR_Ball.  It is interesting that the FPÖ stepped in to save the ball. The FPÖ is one of the most successful extreme right-wing parties in Europe. They claim to represent the common people, who are working hard and having trouble making ends meet. In Austria, the working class and sections of the petty bourgeoisie have traditionally voted for Social Democratic Party. That tradition changed with the rise of the FPÖ 30 years ago. In the last election in September most of the working class voted FPÖ, which succeeded in articlating social problems in terms of race, not class.  Their claim of being the new working class party is harshly contrasted by the elitist self image of the Burschenschaften and the ball.

“Danger area” in effect

The anti-ball demonstrations this year organized by the two leftist alliances “Offensive gegen Rechts (loosely translated as “an alliance/movement against the Right”) and NoWKR  attracted around 10.000 people, which is a good turnout for an antifascist demonstration in Austria. A third rally from the alliance “Jetzt Zeichen setzen” (“Set an example now”), which is rooted in humanitarian NGOs and the Green and Social democratic parties as well as organisations of survivors of the holocaust and the Jewish Religious Community, was banned from the Heldenplatz. The police also passed a decree, which limited some basic citizen rights. In the first nine (inner city) districts, for example, it was prohibited to carry something with you that would allow you to cover up your face. It was up to the police to decide what “covering” meant and it could also include things like scarves or caps. Just a reminder: On this weekend the temperature dropped to -8°C in Vienna. It was our own version of the kind of “danger area” that we saw in Hamburg a few days earlier, when the police could randomly perform identity checks in a regulated area after. The police in Hamburg made exaggerated claims to have been attacked by people, who protested against the eviction of the autonomous youth centre Rote Flora. But it didn’t stop there in Vienna. The police also restricted the freedom of press. They announced an exclusion zone that was far bigger than that which was set up when the president of the United States visited Vienna in 2006. Furthermore, the police also banned the press from entering this zone, which effectively prohibited them from reporting from the ball itself. The press was only allowed to enter for a very short period of time (half an hour) and only accompanied by a police press officer.

Austrian media hysteria against antifascism

One might think that the ball itself and the police restrictions caused a major outrage in the Austrian media, but that would be mistaken. The media outrage was over the actions of the antifascist protests, focusing on what the BBC termed nothing but “minor incidents” such as smashing windows. Most of the media decided not to concern themselves with the odious substance of the Burschenschaften ball or the erasure of democracy by the police. All they could talk about was what they called a “left-wing extremist” by a group called “the black block.”. But wait, it got worse. The president of the Viennese police said live on TV that he wanted to identify those injured by the police that sought help from the rescue service so that he could press charges. Essentially, those who sought medical attention can now be prosecuted. Just to put things into perspective, the headquarters of “Offensive gegen Rechts” had to function as mobile hospital because of the many injured antifascists. Two special vehicles from the rescue services, which only apply in states of disaster, were activated along with 5-8 normal ambulance vehicles. And the persecution of the anti-fascist movement is still not over. The same police president called for demonstrators to be “hunted down”. Also, he used the expression “Wer sich mit Hunden ins Bett legt, wacht mit Flöhen wieder auf” (literal translation,” If you lay with dogs, you will wake up with fleas”, meaning. if you put yourself in danger, you have only yourself to blame) to dismiss and criminalise antifascist protest altogether. To top this all off, it has recently been revealed that he was in a Burschenschaft in his youth and still holds contact to its members. (He is also a member of the Social Democratic party by the way, at least for now).

The end result of this affair is that antifascism in Austria has been increasingly criminalized by the police while the true importance of the ball has received very little media coverage. Antifascists are victims of crime and threats whereas the right-wing extremist scene grows bolder by the day. The antifascist mobilisation was still a very big success and people do want to do something against this ever growing threat, but this time they were failed by the media in a massive way. The imbalance between reports from the foreign press and the Austrian press reached a comical level. The foreign press was very critical in their reports of the ball and those in charge who enabled it (such as the FPÖ or the people in charge at the Hofburg) while the Austrian press once again perceived the biggest threat to be not fascism, but antifascism.


By Natascha Strobl

Natascha Strobl is a political scientist and antifascist activist from Vienna, active with Offensive gegen Rechts. She writes her own blog about right wing extremism – (in German).

One reply on “In Austria right wing extremism is having a ball”

It always baffles me that participants, supporters and friendly reporters of a movement or an organization are completely lacking self-criticism. The summary of the article is that “the media abandoned us, Austrian press is stupid, so as the establishment and the public in general – we did everything right”. However the most important questions are not being asked: how could this have happened? Why do we have such a negative public image? Why can’t we articulate our messages? What are the reasons, so that we may alter our ways and means to address these reasons?

I’m not familiar with Austrian political dynamics, I’m not affiliated with either side (but I don’t support racial, sexual or gender categorization narratives), but the name ‘anti-right movement’ makes me frown. If we see the political scene as a pit of struggle where narratives collide, which is more successful, if narrative “A” is given: narrative “anti-A” or narrative “B”? As an unaffiliated bystander, my main question is not “why is the far right bad”, but “what strategy do you propose then?”

I think that while ‘leftist’ movements’ main characteristic is “we are totally not the far right, because that’s like you know, really bad, m’okay?”, they will always be bound to lag behind all kinds of right-wing movements which propose and ideology and narrative that’s capable of standing on their own. The anti-fascists lock themselves in the dialogue of “nazi – not nazi”, instead of breaking this unproductive circle, and proposing a working alternative dialogue, leaving all this century old crap behind.

Comments are closed.